Climate justice integrates the multifaceted layers of global warming, from its environmental consequences to its deeper ethical, human rights, and political implications. This perspective champions the idea that addressing climate change is not just an environmental necessity but also a moral obligation, given its disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations. Central to this is the principle of 'Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities' (CBDR-RC). This concept emphasizes that while all nations share the responsibility to address climate change, their roles differ based on their historical contributions to emissions and their developmental contexts. Complicating this picture further is the emissions gap, a crucial metric highlighting the divergence between the greenhouse gas reductions that nations have pledged and what is scientifically necessary to prevent catastrophic warming.
Case Study: The Maldives and Climate Justice
Nestled in the Indian Ocean, The Maldives presents a stark example of the frontline impacts of climate change. As an island nation vulnerable to sea-level rise, its very existence hangs in the balance. Our discussion will center on the proactive steps the Maldivian government is taking, not only to ensure their nation's survival but also to foreground the principles of climate justice on the world stage. We will dissect their dual challenge: advocating for equitable global climate policies while simultaneously navigating the intricacies of national development and environmental protection.
Readings:
UNICEF Climate Justice
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities - UN